Current:Home > reviewsApple app store consumer class action set for February 2026 jury trial -PrestigeTrade
Apple app store consumer class action set for February 2026 jury trial
View
Date:2025-04-27 22:26:27
Apple is now facing a February 2026 trial in a $7 billion class action in California federal court that accuses the company of monopolizing the app market for its iPhones, causing tens of millions of customers to pay higher prices.
U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers set the date for the jury trial in an order, opens new tab on Thursday, after ruling earlier this year to certify the case as a class action comprising all U.S. Apple customers who spent $10 or more on Apple app or in-app purchases since 2008.
The lawsuit, filed in 2011, accuses Apple of artificially inflating the 30% sales commission charged to developers on the company's App Store, claiming that the overcharges are passed down to consumers through increased prices for apps.
An expert for the plaintiffs estimated damages of between $7 billion and $10 billion, court records show. An appeals court in May declined Apple's bid to hear its challenge to the class order before trial.
Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Apple has denied any wrongdoing.
More:After massive AT&T data breach, do users need to do anything?
An attorney for the plaintiffs, Mark Rifkin of Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, said on Friday that "nearly all the pretrial work is complete and we are looking forward to the trial of this important case."
In a different case, Rogers is weighing whether Apple has complied with an order requiring it to give developers more freedom to show consumers other ways to pay for purchases made within apps.
That lawsuit, by “Fortnite” maker Epic Games, did not seek monetary damages.
The U.S. government and a group of states are separately suing Apple in federal court in New Jersey for allegedly monopolizing the smartphone market. Apple has denied the claims and said it will ask a judge to dismiss the lawsuit. The first major hearing in the case is set for July 17.
In re: Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR.
veryGood! (19)
Related
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Michael Bublé Details Heartwarming Moment With Taylor Swift’s Parents at Eras Tour
- Chiquis comes from Latin pop royalty. How the regional Mexican star found her own crown
- US inflation likely edged up last month, though not enough to deter another Fed rate cut
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- GM to retreat from robotaxis and stop funding its Cruise autonomous vehicle unit
- Secretly recorded videos are backbone of corruption trial for longest
- Woody Allen and Soon
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Woody Allen and Soon
Ranking
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Dropping Hints
- 'Mary': How to stream, what biblical experts think about Netflix's new coming
- The Sundance Film Festival unveils its lineup including Jennifer Lopez, Questlove and more
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Save 30% on the Perfect Spongelle Holiday Gifts That Make Every Day a Spa Day
- Shanghai bear cub Junjun becomes breakout star
- Our 12 favorites moments of 2024
Recommendation
Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
ParkMobile $32.8 million settlement: How to join class
Kylie Kelce's podcast 'Not Gonna Lie' tops Apple, Spotify less than a week after release
I loved to hate pop music, until Chappell Roan dragged me back
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
Through 'The Loss Mother's Stone,' mothers share their grief from losing a child to stillbirth
What was 2024's best movie? From 'The Substance' to 'Conclave,' our top 10
Most reports ordered by California’s Legislature this year are shown as missing